[1]施存龙.建文帝从泉州港乘阿拉伯船逃亡海外真实性考析[J].南通航运职业技术学院学报,2019,(03):66-68.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9891.2019.03.015]
　SHI Cun-long.Analytical Study of the Authenticity of Emperor Jianwen’s Escape from Port of Quanzhou by an Arab Ship[J].Journal of Nantong Vocational & Technical Shipping College,2019,(03):66-68.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9891.2019.03.015]
点击复制

建文帝从泉州港乘阿拉伯船逃亡海外真实性考析(/HTML)
分享到：

南通航运职业技术学院学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年03期
页码:
66-68
栏目:
郑和研究
出版日期:
2019-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:

Analytical Study of the Authenticity of Emperor Jianwen’s Escape from Port of Quanzhou by an

Arab Ship

作者:
施存龙
交通运输部水运科学研究院
Author(s):
SHI Cun-long
Water Transport Science Research Institute, Ministry of Transport
关键词:
明代泉州港;  建文帝逃亡;  李挺追踪
Keywords:
Quanzhou Port in Ming Dynasty;  Emperor Jianwen’s escape;  Li Ting tracing
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1671-9891.2019.03.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:

央视纪录片《历史的拐点·下西洋》命题贴切，但其中某些观点有待商榷。经考证分析，文章认为当时的

泉州港已不具备建文帝外逃的客观条件，建文帝也未曾到泉州开元寺出家。所谓建文帝从泉州乘阿拉伯商

船逃往海外，李挺追踪建文帝到泉州说法，源自日本小说《大航海》虚构及“台湾”和上海作家的相继误

传。

Abstract:

The proposition of CCTV documentary The Turning Point of History ·The Voyages to Western

Ocean is appropriate, but some of the views in it are open to question. After analytical

study, the article presents the view that the Port of Quanzhou at that time lacked objective

conditions for Emperor Jianwen to escape, and Emperor Jianwen did not go to Kaiyuan Temple

being a monk in Quanzhou. The so-called statements that Jianwen Emperor escaped overseas from

Quanzhou by an Arab merchant ship, and Li Ting traced Emperor Jianwen to Quanzhou, were

derived from the fiction of the Japanese novel Great Navigation and successive misinformation

of the writers in Taiwan and Shanghai.

参考文献/References:

[1]何歌劲.建文帝之谜[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,2006.

[2] 《泉州古港史》编写委员会.泉州古港史[M].北京:人民交通出版社,1994.

[3]上杉千年.郑和下西洋[M].上海:上海社会科学出版社,2003.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-03